The Queensland government is taking a bold step to tackle the housing crisis with a new approach: 'Use it or house it'. In a move that could spark debate, they're offering up government-owned land for housing development, aiming to reach a million new homes by 2044. But is this the solution to the housing shortage? Let's explore.
The Land Activation Program (LAP) is a game-changer, allowing developers to scout and claim underutilized government land for housing projects. This initiative is a direct response to the growing demand for housing, especially with Queensland's recent popularity among Australians. The state's regions saw the highest net gain from inter-regional migration in the year leading up to September 2025, according to the Regional Movers Index.
Here's the twist: the program is designed to fast-track the process. Led by Economic Development Queensland (EDQ), it bypasses the usual red tape, expediting approvals and land transfers at residual value. This means developers can quickly turn vacant lots into thriving neighborhoods. The first site, a former Energex depot in Banyo, Brisbane, is set to be transformed into a residential hub with up to 400 new homes, conveniently located near public transport and amenities.
But here's where it gets controversial. The government's decision to exempt the program from the Queensland Government Land Transaction Policy has raised some eyebrows. By allowing land transfers at residual value, they're potentially impacting the market dynamics. Critics might argue this could distort land prices, while supporters see it as a necessary measure to boost housing supply.
The program also invites industry proposals for potential housing sites, with EDQ committing to a swift 30-day assessment. This collaborative approach ensures that the best opportunities are identified and acted upon quickly.
The 'use it or house it' policy is a clear signal of the government's commitment. It mandates the release and development of surplus state-owned land for housing, ensuring that valuable land isn't left idle. This proactive stance has been well-received by industry leaders, who see it as a step towards addressing the housing shortage.
As the LAP gains momentum, it raises questions about the future of housing development in Queensland. Will this initiative meet its ambitious target? How will it shape the state's urban landscape? And what does it mean for the housing market's long-term sustainability? The answers may be complex, but one thing is clear: Queensland is taking action, and the impact could be transformative.
What do you think? Is the LAP a game-changer for Queensland's housing market, or does it present unforeseen challenges? Share your thoughts in the comments, and let's continue the conversation!
