The concept of 'Manchesterism' is making waves in the West Country, sparking debates about the potential for devolution and the distribution of power. This idea, which gained momentum after Prime Minister Rishi Sunak's speech in Manchester, envisions a shift in authority from central government to local communities, particularly in the form of metro mayors and combined authorities. But what does this mean for the West Country, and how might it shape the region's future?
A New Era of Devolution
One of the key aspects of Manchesterism is devolution, which, in the West Country context, could mean a significant transfer of power from Westminster to local authorities. This is particularly intriguing given the region's diverse landscape, ranging from bustling cities like Bristol and Bath to rural areas like Somerset. The idea that local people should have more say in how their communities are run is not new, but the potential for real change is exciting.
Personally, I find it fascinating that the West Country, with its unique blend of urban and rural, could become a testing ground for devolution. The University of Gloucestershire' Prof Matthew Reed highlights the tension between central government and local communities, and the potential for devolution to unleash dynamism and innovation. However, as Dr Sam Power from the University of Bristol points out, the success of devolution on a large scale is an open question, especially considering the low turnout in local elections.
Manchesterism in Rural Contexts
The Somerset Chamber of Commerce's support for Manchesterism is particularly noteworthy. David Crew, the chamber's managing director, believes that the principles of Manchesterism can be applied successfully in rural areas. This is a crucial insight, as it challenges the notion that devolution is solely for urban centers. If Manchesterism is about trusting local leaders to make decisions, then rural areas like Somerset should indeed have the same opportunities.
The Mayor of the West of England Combined Authority (WECA), Helen Godwin, seems to agree, emphasizing the potential for regions outside London to take the lead. This perspective is refreshing, as it shifts the focus away from the capital and towards the diverse regions that make up the UK.
Business Rates and Local Economies
Another intriguing aspect of Manchesterism is its potential impact on local economies, particularly through business rate reform. The Hands off Our Pubs (HOOP) group, based in the Forest of Dean, advocates for reduced business rates and VAT in the hospitality sector. Mark Terry-Lush, a HOOP founder, argues that pubs are vital to local economies, and their closure would have a ripple effect.
However, Phil Kiernan, another HOOP founder and pub owner, takes a different view. He believes that reducing business rates or VAT would allow businesses to grow and create more jobs. This debate highlights the complex nature of economic policies and the need for a nuanced approach.
The Way Forward
The West Country's journey towards Manchesterism is far from straightforward. As the example of Swindon's combined authority shows, there are challenges and conflicts to navigate. The region's diverse population and varying political landscapes will play a significant role in shaping the future of devolution.
In my opinion, the West Country has the potential to become a pioneer in devolution, but it will require careful planning and engagement with local communities. The success of Manchesterism in the region will depend on the ability to address the concerns of all stakeholders, from rural leaders to urban businesses.
As the debate continues, one thing is clear: the West Country is at a pivotal moment in its history. The principles of Manchesterism offer an exciting opportunity to reshape the region's future, but the path ahead is filled with challenges and questions. The coming months will be crucial in determining whether the West Country can unlock its full potential and become a model for devolution across the UK.
